Discussion:
Nutty Kookologist Repetition
(too old to reply)
Aratzio
2009-02-15 00:06:06 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:35:19 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
LOL!!!
He probably typed all that out every time, too, instead of
copy-and-pasting it.
Holy shit.
The undifferentiated halfwit lamer demonstrating how a simple 3 line
patter of c&p can make it froth and project.

The undifferentiated halfwit lamer was also unable to actually address
any point. Not surprising for a halfwit lamer.
ah
2009-02-16 00:17:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aratzio
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:35:19 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
LOL!!!
He probably typed all that out every time, too, instead of
copy-and-pasting it.
Holy shit.
The undifferentiated halfwit lamer demonstrating how a simple 3 line
patter of c&p can make it froth and project.
The undifferentiated halfwit lamer was also unable to actually address
any point. Not surprising for a halfwit lamer.
No surprise there, really
--
ah
Aratzio
2009-02-16 21:23:20 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:17:20 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by ah
Post by Aratzio
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:35:19 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
LOL!!!
He probably typed all that out every time, too, instead of
copy-and-pasting it.
Holy shit.
The undifferentiated halfwit lamer demonstrating how a simple 3 line
patter of c&p can make it froth and project.
The undifferentiated halfwit lamer was also unable to actually address
any point. Not surprising for a halfwit lamer.
No surprise there, really
Erroneous presupposition.
ah
2009-02-17 11:10:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aratzio
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:17:20 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by ah
Post by Aratzio
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:35:19 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
LOL!!!
He probably typed all that out every time, too, instead of
copy-and-pasting it.
Holy shit.
The undifferentiated halfwit lamer demonstrating how a simple 3 line
patter of c&p can make it froth and project.
The undifferentiated halfwit lamer was also unable to actually address
any point. Not surprising for a halfwit lamer.
No surprise there, really
Erroneous presupposition.
Pontification.
--
ah


Aratzio
2009-02-17 23:57:39 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:10:44 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah
Post by ah
Post by Aratzio
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:17:20 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by ah
Post by Aratzio
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:35:19 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
LOL!!!
He probably typed all that out every time, too, instead of
copy-and-pasting it.
Holy shit.
The undifferentiated halfwit lamer demonstrating how a simple 3 line
patter of c&p can make it froth and project.
The undifferentiated halfwit lamer was also unable to actually address
any point. Not surprising for a halfwit lamer.
No surprise there, really
Erroneous presupposition.
Pontification.
As expected from someone without a logical argument.
Peter J Ross
2009-02-18 01:11:54 UTC
Permalink
In alt.usenet.kooks on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:57:39 -0800, Aratzio
Post by Aratzio
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:10:44 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah
Post by ah
Post by Aratzio
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:17:20 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by ah
Post by Aratzio
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:35:19 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
LOL!!!
He probably typed all that out every time, too, instead of
copy-and-pasting it.
Holy shit.
The undifferentiated halfwit lamer demonstrating how a simple 3 line
patter of c&p can make it froth and project.
The undifferentiated halfwit lamer was also unable to actually address
any point. Not surprising for a halfwit lamer.
No surprise there, really
Erroneous presupposition.
Pontification.
As expected from someone without a logical argument.
In your opinion, Bizzarro.
--
PJR :-)
slrn newsreader v0.9.9p1: http://slrn.sourceforge.net/
extra slrn documentation: http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/
newsgroup name validator: http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator
Kali
2009-02-18 19:16:57 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@pjr.gotdns.org>, ***@example.invalid
says...
Post by Peter J Ross
In alt.usenet.kooks on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:57:39 -0800, Aratzio
Post by Aratzio
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:10:44 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah
Post by ah
Post by Aratzio
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:17:20 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by ah
Post by Aratzio
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:35:19 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
Just like every other halfwit lamer, the undifferentiated halfwit
lamer avoids the question and uses its own projected obsession as
*defense*.
LOL!!!
He probably typed all that out every time, too, instead of
copy-and-pasting it.
Holy shit.
The undifferentiated halfwit lamer demonstrating how a simple 3 line
patter of c&p can make it froth and project.
The undifferentiated halfwit lamer was also unable to actually address
any point. Not surprising for a halfwit lamer.
No surprise there, really
Erroneous presupposition.
Pontification.
As expected from someone without a logical argument.
In your opinion, Bizzarro.
You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct, Ross.
--
Kali
§ñühw€£f
2009-02-17 16:04:50 UTC
Permalink
X-Newsreader: slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian)
Message-ID: <b4KdnXptec-***@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:04:50 -0600
Lines: 77
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 98.125.93.98
X-Trace: sv3-GQqJ9gGKZnKki7ujRsRCwMBE+vUZKMsoYm2kjl1yUzoWHxB0LDINhVwRCI0b+nALUMvW8WHriGuHYP4!bHaAE9X72J5cn4aFg06M6AzZn3bTbIj0eIfkqOjWX6kJKDL6ma9her3DIboUYRSFvjLXvl+3TzH2!8q+n5KcmwP+cOLbL7jg7CUA7ieU7af19eNK12/Xj+p3o8A==
X-Complaints-To: ***@centurytel.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: ***@centurytel.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.39
Bytes: 4776
X-Original-Bytes: 4641
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.usenet.kooks:1845143 alt.snuhwolf:539
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:44:28 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
@sneakemail.com says...
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:01:33 -0500, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,
@sneakemail.com.invalid says...
Gee, you ever read any of their lame halfwittery? Really
hard to
differentiate that crap, from say, your crap.
That looks real similar to the list Kali was recently
obsessing over.
So after I humiliated Kali, causing her to run away screaming
into the
distance, you decided to carry the torch for her. That's
real sweet of you.
Deciding that you are a completely boring waste of time is
"running
away, screaming"?
Nice non sequitur avoidance, cowardly liar.
Uh-huh. So, has she expressed her gratitude in any notable way?
So can you differentiate their halfwit lamery from yours and
in what
way do you feel your posts are less or more halfwitted and
lame than
theirs?
You can answer that, right? Unless you would like to claim
they are
greggie or bowtie socks. Since they might be part of that
"dozen or so
halfwit lamers" that you seem to think are only two people you
could
try that. I can't guarantee it would work, but you never know.
You (and Kali) are the ones obsessed with those nyms and who was
actually behind them, not me. I haven't felt the smallest need
to even
Google them up, never mind analyze their posts. That's YOUR
thing, OCD Boy.
Your obsession with me after a few posts, several days ago, is
pretty creepy. What's wrong with you?
If you fed film in its mouth you could watch a movie on the wall.
I'm at my limit for the day after cleaning up some fresh cat puke.
Get a dog, they like cat puke
So, you speak for *all* dogs now?
Whadda youse? Some kinda dog-mind reader?
--
http://eyeonpalin.org/
___ ___ ___ ___
/\__\ /\ \ /\ \ /\ \
/:/ _/_ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /::\ \ _____\:\ \ ___ \:\ \ ___ /::\ \
/:/_/:/\:\__\ /::::::::\__\ /\ \ \:\__\ /\ /:/\:\__\
\:\/:/ /:/ / \:\~~\~~\/__/ \:\ \ /:/ / \:\/:/ \/__/
\::/ /:/ / \:\ \ \:\ /:/ / \::/__/
\/_/:/ / \:\ \ \:\/:/ / \:\ \
/:/ / \:\__\ \::/ / \:\__\
Aratzio
2009-02-18 04:12:34 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:10:39 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
AHEM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observable_universe
"the observable universe is a solid sphere (a ball) centered on the
observer"
Well, if it's on Wikipedia then it HAS to be true.
The undifferentiated halfwit lamer demonstrates its ignorance of basic
science.
§ñühw€£f
2009-02-18 15:43:12 UTC
Permalink
X-Newsreader: slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian)
Message-ID: <-***@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:43:12 -0600
Lines: 91
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 98.125.87.109
X-Trace: sv3-DbZGwnOtb2bDi9XigNfqW71kYlIwbs0Ndgg3dcAljr+kht8w29Tsp3HGqO/v1SlInUP8tQj6lzNtIKG!2Cv2SrDVoMJp3HUszv20EiR5lefGz/kKC7X/2pJFAyz6ItJpXFRumdAPk0po3C2UYCohZIxee0mN!vpQdklgrGL6QRjub3XLUhpXbZ4nEuL71CYXIhrbjiwo9Df0=
X-Complaints-To: ***@centurytel.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: ***@centurytel.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.39
Bytes: 5182
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.usenet.kooks:1845779 alt.snuhwolf:549
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:34:27 +0000, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
In alt.usenet.kooks on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 22:47:11 -0500, Kali
says...
In alt.usenet.kooks on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:01:33 -0500, Kali
@sneakemail.com.invalid says...
Gee, you ever read any of their lame halfwittery? Really
hard to
differentiate that crap, from say, your crap.
That looks real similar to the list Kali was recently
obsessing over.
So after I humiliated Kali, causing her to run away
screaming into the
distance, you decided to carry the torch for her. That's
real sweet of you.
Deciding that you are a completely boring waste of time is
"running
away, screaming"?
Nice non sequitur avoidance, cowardly liar.
Uh-huh. So, has she expressed her gratitude in any notable
way?
So can you differentiate their halfwit lamery from yours and
in what
way do you feel your posts are less or more halfwitted and
lame than
theirs?
You can answer that, right? Unless you would like to claim
they are
greggie or bowtie socks. Since they might be part of that
"dozen or so
halfwit lamers" that you seem to think are only two people
you could
try that. I can't guarantee it would work, but you never
know.
You (and Kali) are the ones obsessed with those nyms and who
was
actually behind them, not me. I haven't felt the smallest need
to even
Google them up, never mind analyze their posts. That's YOUR
thing, OCD Boy.
Your obsession with me after a few posts, several days ago, is
pretty creepy. What's wrong with you?
I'm obsessed with you. I know it's wrong, but it's your fault for
being so very sexy. Does this make me a creep too? :-)
Only to my better half, but he's laughing about it, so, no. :)
Do you think that the kooks will be trolled hard by the brief
conversation about your sexual attractiveness that we've just had?
(You don't need to answer that. There are *screenfuls* of envy and
jealousy posted by pathetic wankers here! I wonder if there are any
depths of lonely sadness to which they won't descend in public.)
BLOW ALL BALLAST TANKS
DIVE DIVE DIVE!
SIR, WE SEEM TO HAVE HIT A SUBMERGED OBJECT OFF THE STARBOARD...
--
http://eyeonpalin.org/
___ ___ ___ ___
/\__\ /\ \ /\ \ /\ \
/:/ _/_ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /::\ \ _____\:\ \ ___ \:\ \ ___ /::\ \
/:/_/:/\:\__\ /::::::::\__\ /\ \ \:\__\ /\ /:/\:\__\
\:\/:/ /:/ / \:\~~\~~\/__/ \:\ \ /:/ / \:\/:/ \/__/
\::/ /:/ / \:\ \ \:\ /:/ / \::/__/
\/_/:/ / \:\ \ \:\/:/ / \:\ \
/:/ / \:\__\ \::/ / \:\__\
§ñühw¤£f
2009-02-18 22:48:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aratzio
@sneakemail.com says...
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:25:01 -0600, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,
<snipped>
I have a new DKos identity. Have you discovered it yet?
I promise you the first diary will be a barnburner!
How appropriate that you'd admit to your creepy obsession
with
Post by Aratzio
Vince
(you know, the one that you've carried off Usenet and onto
Kaos)
in a
thread about obsession.
Mike will correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm almost positive he
was
posting to DKos long before Vince turned up there.
Of course, in her defending poor cranstard, RhonDumb is ignoring
the
fact his stalking of Vince has cost him multiple accounts on
Kos.
Post by Aratzio
I guess if cranstard was there first, the stalking is okay.
Einstein once said "The definition of insanity is doing the same
thing over and over again and expecting different results".
Mikey is insane, according to Einstein.
Snuh?
Yuh.
Auh.
FU W-P !!
Nuh uh.

Rule number one: Dont cascade with babies.
Rule number two: Dont cascade with babies who break cascades.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\__\ /\ \ /\ \ /\ \
/:/ _/_ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /::\ \ _____\:\ \ ___ \:\ \ ___ /::\ \
/:/_/:/\:\__\ /::::::::\__\ /\ \ \:\__\ /\ /:/\:\__\
\:\/:/ /:/ / \:\~~\~~\/__/ \:\ \ /:/ / \:\/:/ \/__/
\::/ /:/ / \:\ \ \:\ /:/ / \::/__/
\/_/:/ / \:\ \ \:\/:/ / \:\ \
/:/ / \:\__\ \::/ / \:\__\
\/__/ \/__/ \/__/ \/__/
http://www.bds-palestine.net/
http://shoebush.org/
+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+
|S|a|y| |D|u|h| |t|o| |A|y|n| |R|a|n|d|
+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+
Loading...